Hollis v. State

73 So. 758, 15 Ala. App. 440, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 9
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 73 So. 758 (Hollis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollis v. State, 73 So. 758, 15 Ala. App. 440, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 9 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

The motion shown in transcript to set aside the verdict of conviction on account of surprise as to the testimony of certain witnesses introduced in behalf of the state on the trial cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The record proper shows proceedings regular in all things; and no error appearing, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 758, 15 Ala. App. 440, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-v-state-alactapp-1917.