Hollis v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hollis v. State

73 So. 758, 15 Ala. App. 440, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 9

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 9, 1917·Published

Opinion

PELHAM, P. J.

The motion shown in transcript to set aside the verdict of conviction on account of surprise as to the testimony of certain witnesses introduced in behalf of the state on the trial cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The record proper shows proceedings regular in all things; and no error appearing, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PELHAM, P. J.

The motion shown in transcript to set aside the verdict of conviction on account of surprise as to the testimony of certain witnesses introduced in behalf of the state on the trial cannot be reviewed, in the absence of a bill of exceptions. The record proper shows proceedings regular in all things; and no error appearing, the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Hollis v. State, 73 So. 758, 15 Ala. App. 440, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 9 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

73 So. 758 (Hollis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.