Hollis v. Morris

2 Del. 128
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1836·Published

Opinion

The Court

charged,

1st. That the former recovery was conclusive on all subjects and causes of action that might have been included in the former suit, unless the plaintiff shows by proof, that the matter now sued for, was not in fact included in that action. 16 Johns. Rep. 136; 2 Ibid.

2d. That if the gig was placed with the defendant by plaintiff, to defraud his creditors, and there was no actual bona fide sale of it, the plaintiff is not entitled to the aid of a court of justice to recover it back.

Yerdict for defendant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollis v. Morris, 2 Del. 128 (Del. Ct. App. 1836).

2 Del. 128 (Hollis v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.