Hollis v. Hollis
98 A. 789, 254 Pa. 90, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 689
Opinion
This decree is affirmed, at the costs of the appellant, on the facts found by the learned chancellor below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollis v. Hollis, 98 A. 789, 254 Pa. 90, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 689 (Pa. 1916).
98 A. 789 (Hollis v. Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Penza Estate
59 Pa. D. & C.2d 19 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Haftman Estate
30 Pa. D. & C.2d 4 (Washington County Orphans' Court, 1962)
Roth Estate
15 Pa. D. & C.2d 473 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1959)
Elliott Estate
106 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
DANNER v. Danner
77 A.2d 217 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Brenneman Estate
63 A.2d 59 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1948)
Popilock v. Piernikoski
56 A.2d 326 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Wunder's Estate
59 Pa. D. & C. 1 (Berks County Orphans' Court, 1946)
Van Sciver v. Rothensies
36 F. Supp. 577 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1941)
Gribbel v. Gribbel
17 A.2d 892 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Mader v. Stemler
179 A. 719 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Rocks v. Sheppard
152 A. 754 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
Estate of Agnes Blaszcak
90 Pa. Super. 589 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Stuckey v. Truett
117 S.E. 192 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1923)