Hollis v. Hollis
383 So. 2d 1269
Opinions
This appeal was fixed for argument and all attorneys of record were notified. At the time scheduled for argument, the appellant was not present or represented. Furthermore, no brief had been filed on behalf of appellant, nor had any motion been filed for a continuance.
Pursuant to Rule 7, Section 5(b) of the Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, this court, ex proprio motu, considers this appeal abandoned. Therefore, it is. ordered that this appeal be dismissed with prejudice.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollis v. Hollis, 383 So. 2d 1269 (La. Ct. App. 1980).
383 So. 2d 1269 (Hollis v. Hollis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nicolle v. Nicolle
308 So. 2d 377 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
Savoie v. Curtis
354 So. 2d 705 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)
Johnson v. Johnson
293 So. 2d 213 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1974)
McCain v. McCain
374 So. 2d 135 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1979)