Hollis v. California

Supreme Court

Hollis v. California

386 U.S. 262

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. No. 46·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result .in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result .in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Hollis v. California, 386 U.S. 262 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 262 (Hollis v. California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.