Hollis v. Brown
28 A. 360, 159 Pa. 539, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 890
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 29, 1894·No. Appeal, No. 129·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. Assuming, as we must, for the purposes of this appeal, that all the averments contained in the affidavit of defence are true, there is nothing in them that amounts to a defence to the plaintiff’s case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollis v. Brown, 28 A. 360, 159 Pa. 539, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 890 (Pa. 1894).
28 A. 360 (Hollis v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Silverman v. Bullock
67 A.2d 586 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Cusick v. Woolworth
4 Pa. D. & C. 807 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Davis v. Pierce
52 Pa. Super. 615 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)