Hollis v. Brown
28 A. 360, 159 Pa. 539, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 890
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 29, 1894
DocketAppeal, No. 129
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 28 A. 360 (Hollis v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollis v. Brown, 28 A. 360, 159 Pa. 539, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 890 (Pa. 1894).
Opinion
We are satisfied from an examination of the record that there was no error in making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. Assuming, as we must, for the purposes of this appeal, that all the averments contained in the affidavit of defence are true, there is nothing in them that amounts to a defence to the plaintiff’s case.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Silverman v. Bullock
67 A.2d 586 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1949)
Cusick v. Woolworth
4 Pa. D. & C. 807 (Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Davis v. Pierce
52 Pa. Super. 615 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 A. 360, 159 Pa. 539, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-v-brown-pa-1894.