Hollis Frazier Hutchins v. United States

322 F.2d 649
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 13, 1963
Docket7355_1
StatusPublished

This text of 322 F.2d 649 (Hollis Frazier Hutchins v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollis Frazier Hutchins v. United States, 322 F.2d 649 (10th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for relief from a sentence imposed after jury trial for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The only point deserving consideration relates to the admission of a statement made while in state custody. The trial court found, and the record confirms, that the statement was entirely of an exculpatory nature consistent with the defense presented by the movant. Without consideration of whether the point may be raised on a collateral attack, we are convinced that Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479, has no application because the statement was in explanation of movant's, conduct rather than a statement against interest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mallory v. United States
354 U.S. 449 (Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
322 F.2d 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollis-frazier-hutchins-v-united-states-ca10-1963.