Hollinshead v. Borough of Oaklyn
97 N.J.L. 334
This text of 97 N.J.L. 334 (Hollinshead v. Borough of Oaklyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollinshead v. Borough of Oaklyn, 97 N.J.L. 334 (N.J. 1922).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenohard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Katzisnbach, Williams, Gardner, Van Buskirk, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
97 N.J.L. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollinshead-v-borough-of-oaklyn-nj-1922.