Hollins v. Walmart, Inc.

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 28, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-00494·Unknown

Opinion

1 | KRISTOPHER M. HELMICK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13348 2 | KIRILL V. MIKHAYLOV, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13538 3 || BOHDEN G. COLE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15719 4 || PACIFIC WEST INJURY LAW 8180 Rafael Rivera Way, Suite 200 5 || Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 Phone: (702) 602-4878 6 || Fax: (702) 665-5627 Kris@PacificWestInjury.com 7 || Kinll@PacificWestInjury.com Bohden@PacificWestInjury.com 8 || Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |W DISTRICT OF NEVADA > ' | JAMES HOLLINS, individually, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00494

2 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 2 14 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED WALMART INC., d/b/a WALMART, a ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY 15 foreign corporation; and DOES I-X; and ROE DEADLINES BUSINESS ENTITIES XI-XX, inclusive. 16 (EIGHTH REQUEST) Defendants 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the parties and their attorneys | 19 record, that the current discovery deadlines pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(b). 20 21 DISCOVERY COMPLETED TO DATE 22 1. The parties have conducted the FRCP 26.1 Early Case Conference. 23 2. Plaintiff has produced his Lists of Witnesses and Documents, and supplements there 24 pursuant to FRCP 26(a) disclosing approximately 2000 pages. 25 3. Defendant has produced his Lists of Witnesses and Documents, and supplemen 26 | thereto pursuant to FRCP 26(a). 27 4. Defendant has propounded Request for Admission (35), Request for Production | 28 | Documents (27) and Interrogatories (30) to Plaintiff on May 13, 2024. Page | of 7

1 5. Plaintiff has responded to Request for Admission (35), Request for Production | 2 || Documents (27) and Interrogatories (30) on August 2, 2024. 3 6. Defendant has propounded a Second Set of Interrogatories (6) on August 16, 2024. 4 7. FRCP Rule 35 Examination of Plaintiff on September 30, 2024. 5 8. Inspection of the subject premises on October 3, 2024. 6 9. Plaintiff has propounded Request for Production of Documents (18) and 7 Interrogatories (14) to Defendant on October 17, 2025. 8 10. Defendant served its Designation of Initial Experts on October 31, 2024. 9 11. Plaintiff served his Designation of Initial Experts on November 7, 2024.

10 12. Defendant has responded to Request for Production of Documents (18) ar 11 || Interrogatories (14) on November 25, 2024. 12 13. Plaintiff has produced his First Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 13 || March 13, 2024. = 14 14. ‘Plaintiff has produced his Second Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 15 || July 9, 2024. 16 15. Plaintiffhas produced his Third Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents on Ju 17 || 9, 2024. 18 16. Plaintiff has produced his Fourth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 19 || August 1, 2024. 20 17. Plaintiff has produced his Fifth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 21 |} August 2, 2024. 22 18. — Plaintiff has produced his Sixth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 23 || August 12, 2024. 24 19. Plaintiff has produced his Seventh Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 25 || November 6, 2024. 26 20. Plaintiff has produced his Eighth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 27 || November 18, 2024. 28 20. Defendant has served its First Supplement to Initial Experts on December 4, 2024. Page 2 of 7

1 21. Defendant has served its Designation of Rebuttal Experts on December 6, 2024. 2 22. Defendant has produced its First Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 3 || September 13, 2024. 4 23. Defendant has produced its Second Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 5 || October 17, 2024. 6 24. Defendant has produced its Third Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 7 || November 27, 2024. 8 25. Defendant has produced its Fourth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 9 || December 10, 2024.

10 26. Defendant has produced its Fifth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « 11 || December 17, 2024. 12 27. Plaintiff has produced his Ninth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « ~ 13 || January 6, 2025. = 14 29. Defendant has produced its Sixth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents « = 15 || January 9. 2025. 16 30. Defendant has produced its Seventh Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 17 || February 27, 2025. 18 31. Plaintiff has produced his Tenth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 19 || February 25, 2025. 20 32. Plaintiff has produced his Eleventh Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 21 |} March 12, 2025. 22 33. Plaintiff has produced his Twelfth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 23 || March 20, 2025. 24 34. Plaintiff has produced his Thirteenth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documen 25 || on April 21, 2025. 26 33. Defendant has produced its Eight Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents ¢ 27 || April 24, 2025. 28 34. Plaintiff has produced his Fourteenth Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documen Page 3 of 7

1 || on June 12, 2025. 2 35. Defendant has served its Second Supplement to Initial Experts on June 24, 2025. 3 36. Deposition of Janette Hollins taken on August 22, 2024. 4 37. Deposition of Plaintiff James Hollins taken on August 22, 2024. 5 38. Deposition of David Hart taken on April 2, 2025. 6 39. Deposition of Dr. Wu taken on April 15, 2025. 7 40. Deposition of Dr. Luis Diaz taken on March 24, 2025. g 41. Deposition of Dr. Willis Chang taken on March 24, 2025. 9 42. Deposition of Dr. Kenneth Chang taken on April 29, 2025.

10 43. Deposition of Dr. Andrew Manov taken March 27, 2025. 11 44. _ Deposition of David Elliott, P.-E. taken on April 24, 2025. 12 45. Deposition of Dr. Nathan Richards taken on May 1, 2025.

~ 13 46. Deposition of Dr. Eric Swanson taken on May 5, 2025.

= 14 47. Plaintiff has produced his Fifteen Supplement Lists of Witnesses and Documents «

™ 15 || August 6, 2025. 16 48. Deposition of Defendant Walmart Inc.’s 30(b)(6) witness was taken on July 16, 202. 17 49. On August 18, 2025, Plaintiff served his First Supplement to his Initial Expe 18 || Disclosure produced David Elliot’s supplemental report. 19 Il. 20 DISCOVERY THAT REMAINS TO BE COMPLETED 21 1. Continued Deposition of Defendant Walmart Inc.’s 30(b)(6) witness. 3 2. Witness Depositions. 3. Deposition of Dr. Nick Liu. 95 3. Any remaining discovery the parties deem relevant and necessary as discove continues. 26 /// 27 3g /// Hil. Page 4 of 7

REASONS THE PARTIES REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DISCOVERY DEADLINES

2 LR 26-3 governs modifications or extension of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Ar 3 || stipulation or motion to extend or modify that Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order must be made r 4 || later than twenty-one (21) days before the expiration of the subject deadline and must comply ful 5 || with LR 26-3. If the stipulation is made less than twenty-one (21) days before the expiration of 6 || deadline, the parties must show a good cause exist. A request made after the expiration of the subje 7 || deadline will not be granted unless the movant also demonstrates that the failure to act was the rest 8 |) of excusable neglect. 9 A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on 10 || showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis □□□□□ > 11 || whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related