Hollins v. State

608 So. 2d 546, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 336077
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 18, 1992
DocketNo. 91-3203
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 546 (Hollins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollins v. State, 608 So. 2d 546, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 336077 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction but because the trial court failed to enter a contemporaneous written order justifying departure from the sentencing guidelines we vacate appellant’s sentence on Count I and remand with directions that a guidelines sentence be imposed. We reject all of the other issues raised by appellant.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WILBERT HOLLINS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 546, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12040, 1992 WL 336077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollins-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.