Hollins v. City of Alexandria
This text of 60 F.3d 822 (Hollins v. City of Alexandria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 822
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
George Donald HOLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF ALEXANDRIA; Patricia S. Tricer, Mayor; Charles E.
Samarra, Police Chief; Sergeant Burnham; Tammy Hooper;
Cynthia Scott; William Bunney; Richard Griffin; Derek
Gaunt; Officer Whelan, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7411.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.
George Donald Hollins, Appellant Pro Se. George McAndrews, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Alexandria, VA, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hollins v. City of Alexandria, No. CA-93-570-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 822, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24863, 1995 WL 404945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollins-v-city-of-alexandria-ca4-1995.