Hollingsworth v. Town of Mount Airy

125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 832, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 218
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 26, 1924·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

All the questions presented and raised on this appeal were considered by us and determined against the plaintiff’s position in the case of Tarboro v. Forbes, 185 N. C., 59. The judgment must be affirmed on authority of that case.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollingsworth v. Town of Mount Airy, 125 S.E. 925, 188 N.C. 832, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 218 (N.C. 1924).

125 S.E. 925 (Hollingsworth v. Town of Mount Airy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raleigh Cemetery Ass'n v. City of Raleigh
70 S.E.2d 506 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Tarboro v. . Forbes
116 S.E. 81 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1923)
State v. . Killian
92 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1917)