Hollingsworth v. Smith

45 Ga. 583
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Ga. 583 (Hollingsworth v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollingsworth v. Smith, 45 Ga. 583 (Ga. 1872).

Opinion

McCay, Judge.

It is true that the Act of 1868 authorizes any one who does not desire to take advantage of its provisions, if he pleases, to seek the benefit of the old exemption law, as provided by the Code. But there was nothing in this bill or answer or in any of the proceedings to authorize the charge asked for. The bill and the answer make the issue that was on trial, and there was nothing in either to call for the request made. The issue was whether the homestead, as set apart by the Ordinary, on the petition, was or was not subject to the fi. fa. That was the thing the jury was to pass on, and the question whether, if a wholly different petition had been made, and a wholly different proceeding taken, the exemption [585]*585procured under such other petition and proceeding, would have been subject to the fi. fa., was a matter wholly foreign to the case before the Court, and we think the Judge was perfectly right not to charge as asked.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Ga. 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollingsworth-v-smith-ga-1872.