Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank

161 S.E. 256, 173 Ga. 785, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 404

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 13, 1931·No. No. 8302·Published

Opinion

This case came by writ of error complaining that the' lower court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Rus[786]*786sell, O. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

No. 8302. November 13, 1931. E. E. Merry, G. L. Worthy, and M. L. Ledford, for plaintiffs in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came by writ of error complaining that the' lower court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Rus[786]*786sell, O. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

No. 8302. November 13, 1931. E. E. Merry, G. L. Worthy, and M. L. Ledford, for plaintiffs in error.

Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank, 161 S.E. 256, 173 Ga. 785, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 404 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

161 S.E. 256 (Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.