Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank

161 S.E. 256, 173 Ga. 785, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 404

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1931

DocketNo. 8302

StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 256 (Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollingsworth v. Merchants & Planters Bank, 161 S.E. 256, 173 Ga. 785, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 404 (Ga. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

This case came by writ of error complaining that the' lower court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Rus[786]*786sell, O. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

No. 8302. November 13, 1931. E. E. Merry, G. L. Worthy, and M. L. Ledford, for plaintiffs in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case came by writ of error complaining that the' lower court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. On this question the court is evenly divided, Beck, P. J., and Hill and Hines, JJ., being of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion, and Rus[786]*786sell, O. J., and Atkinson and Gilbert, JJ., being of the contrary opinion; and the judgment stands affirmed by operation of law.

No. 8302. November 13, 1931. E. E. Merry, G. L. Worthy, and M. L. Ledford, for plaintiffs in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 S.E. 256, 173 Ga. 785, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollingsworth-v-merchants-planters-bank-ga-1931.