Hollingsworth v. King

816 S.W.2d 340, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 6, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 112, 1991 WL 194262
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1991·No. D-1362·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George and May Hollingsworth sued Pete and Bonnie King for negligently failing to restrain a horse from wandering onto a public highway. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Kings, which the court of appeals reversed 810 S.W.2d 772. The Hollingsworths have nevertheless applied to this Court for writ of error. Their sole contention in this Court is that the court of appeals erred in holding that there is no common law duty to restrain livestock. We express no opinion on this contention and deny the application. In so doing, however, we should not be taken as approving any other part of the court of appeals’ opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollingsworth v. King, 816 S.W.2d 340, 35 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 6, 1991 Tex. LEXIS 112, 1991 WL 194262 (Tex. 1991).

816 S.W.2d 340 (Hollingsworth v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibbs v. Jackson
959 S.W.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)