Hollingshead v. Wainwright

384 U.S. 31, 86 S. Ct. 1284, 16 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 18, 1966
Docket457, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 384 U.S. 31 (Hollingshead v. Wainwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 384 U.S. 31, 86 S. Ct. 1284, 16 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823 (1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. State
415 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Herzig
208 So. 2d 619 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Hollingshead v. State
205 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Herzig v. State
200 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Hollingshead v. Wainwright
194 So. 2d 577 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Bashlor v. Wainwright
189 So. 2d 800 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 U.S. 31, 86 S. Ct. 1284, 16 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollingshead-v-wainwright-scotus-1966.