Hollingshead v. Wainwright

384 U.S. 31, 86 S. Ct. 1284, 16 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 18, 1966·No. 457, Misc·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 384 U.S. 31, 86 S. Ct. 1284, 16 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1823 (1966).

384 U.S. 31 (Hollingshead v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meyer v. State
415 So. 2d 70 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State v. Herzig
208 So. 2d 619 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1968)
Hollingshead v. State
205 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Herzig v. State
200 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Hollingshead v. Wainwright
194 So. 2d 577 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)
Bashlor v. Wainwright
189 So. 2d 800 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)