Hollinger v. State

941 So. 2d 1249, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19284, 2006 WL 3327858
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 2006·No. No. 5D06-2496·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Tre-ston Hollinger’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, with the exception of ground 6. As the State properly concedes, the trial court inadvertently failed to consider ground 6 of Hollinger’s motion. Consequently, we remand this matter to the trial court to consider ground 6. In all other respects, the matter is affirmed.

[1250]*1250AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART, REMANDED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollinger v. State, 941 So. 2d 1249, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19284, 2006 WL 3327858 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 1249 (Hollinger v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollinger v. Secretary Department of Corrections
334 F. App'x 302 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)