Hollinger v. State
This text of 564 So. 2d 262 (Hollinger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reject the defendant’s first two points on appeal on the authority of State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648, 653 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 882, 102 S.Ct. 369, 70 L.Ed.2d 195 (1981); Ross v. State, 386 So.2d 1191 (Fla.1980); Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978). However, we reverse his conviction on the charge of possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony on the authority of Jones v. State, 547 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). As in Jones and Reddick v. State, 554 So.2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), we certify conflict with Harper v. State, 537 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989).
In all other respects, the defendant’s convictions and corresponding sentences are hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
564 So. 2d 262, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5272, 1990 WL 102672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollinger-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.