Hollinger v. Federal Trade Commission

D.C. Circuit

Hollinger v. Federal Trade Commission

6 F. App'x 4

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 2001

DocketNo. 01-5003

StatusPublished

This text of 6 F. App'x 4 (Hollinger v. Federal Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollinger v. Federal Trade Commission, 6 F. App'x 4 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, and the supplement thereto, filed by the appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders, filed August 7, 2000, and September 11, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its decisions.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, and the supplement thereto, filed by the appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders, filed August 7, 2000, and September 11, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its decisions.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 F. App'x 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollinger-v-federal-trade-commission-cadc-2001.