Holliman v. State

97 S.E. 263, 23 Ga. App. 18
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 7, 1918
Docket10015
StatusPublished

This text of 97 S.E. 263 (Holliman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holliman v. State, 97 S.E. 263, 23 Ga. App. 18 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

The verdict of voluntary manslaughter was authorized by the statement of the accused, and there is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur. Conviction of manslaughter; from' Warren -superior court— Judge Walker. July 16, 1918. M. L. Felts, for plaintiff in error. B. G. Norman, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 263, 23 Ga. App. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holliman-v-state-gactapp-1918.