Hollie v. State

984 S.W.2d 263, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, 1999 WL 10397
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 13, 1999·No. No. 546-98·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[264] OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement in the Colorado County Jail for six months, probated for two years, plus a $1,000.00 fine. The trial court, as a condition of probation, ordered confinement in the Colorado County Jail for forty-five days.

The Houston Court of Appeals, First District, affirmed the conviction but modified the judgment by ordering thirty days’ confinement in the county jail as a condition of probation instead of forty-five days as originally ordered by the trial court. Hollie v. State 962 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 st Dist.] 1998).1 Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review with this Court alleging two grounds for review. We granted appellant’s second ground for review in order to decide whether “the Court of Appeals erred by failing to remand for a new punishment hearing.”

We now find that our decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.RApp.Pro. 69.3

Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hollie v. State, 984 S.W.2d 263, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, 1999 WL 10397 (Tex. 1999).

984 S.W.2d 263 (Hollie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jerome Paul Marroquin
253 S.W.3d 783 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
Liscum, Samantha v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005
Kendrick v. State
93 S.W.3d 230 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Kendrick, Timothy M. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002