Hollie v. State
This text of 984 S.W.2d 263 (Hollie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[264]*264 OPINION
Appellant was convicted by a jury of the misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement in the Colorado County Jail for six months, probated for two years, plus a $1,000.00 fine. The trial court, as a condition of probation, ordered confinement in the Colorado County Jail for forty-five days.
The Houston Court of Appeals, First District, affirmed the conviction but modified the judgment by ordering thirty days’ confinement in the county jail as a condition of probation instead of forty-five days as originally ordered by the trial court. Hollie v. State 962 S.W.2d 302 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 st Dist.] 1998).1 Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review with this Court alleging two grounds for review. We granted appellant’s second ground for review in order to decide whether “the Court of Appeals erred by failing to remand for a new punishment hearing.”
We now find that our decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.RApp.Pro. 69.3
Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
984 S.W.2d 263, 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, 1999 WL 10397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollie-v-state-texcrimapp-1999.