Holliday v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

190 Md. 732
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 17, 1947
DocketH. C. No. 14
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 Md. 732 (Holliday v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holliday v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 190 Md. 732 (Md. 1947).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

The petitioner was sentenced on February 28, 1946, to six years in the Maryland Penitentiary for assault with intent to rob. He was paroled from that institution on October 29, 1946, and returned for violation of his parole on September 5, 1947. He states that his attorney failed to get witnesses in court; that there was no testimony to show that he broke any laws. It does not appear that he asked that witnesses be summoned, whether they were summoned, or what they would testify if present. Rountree v. Wright, Warden, 189 Md. 292, 55 A. 2d 847, just decided. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 344, 44 A. 2d. 807; Bernard v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 187 Md. 273, 49 A. 2d. 737; Copeland v. Wright, 188 Md. 666, 53 A. 2d. 553.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holliday v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
81 A.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 Md. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holliday-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1947.