Holliday v. United States
This text of 104 F. App'x 650 (Holliday v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[651]*651MEMORANDUM
Robert Holliday and Johnnie Ann Holli-day seek declaratory relief and a tax refund for the years 1991, 1992 and 1993. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed taxes, penalties and interest for the three years in question. The Hollidays filed Internal Revenue Form 1040s showing zero tax due, and sought a declaration that they had zero tax liability. The district court granted the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and we review de novo. See Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 332 F.3d 551, 556 (9th Cir.2003).
For sovereign immunity to be waived in a tax refund suit, the taxpayer must pay the assessed taxes before filing a refund suit. 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(1); Flora v. United States, 357 U.S. 63, 75, 78 S.Ct. 1079, 2 L.Ed.2d 1165 (1958). The Holli-days do not allege payment of the assessed taxes or provide any proof of payment. Further, the Hollidays cannot maintain a suit seeking a declaration with respect to federal taxes. See 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a). We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 650, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holliday-v-united-states-ca9-2004.