Holliday v. Steele

65 Tex. 388, 1886 Tex. LEXIS 674
Texas Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 1886·No. Case No. 2192·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Robertson, Associate Justice.

defendant in error recovered a judgment by default against the plaintiffs in error. The return upon the citation is in the following words: “Came to hand on the twelfth day of February, A. D. 1884, at 11 o’clock a. m., and executed the eighteenth day of February, A. D. 1884, by delivering to [389] Mrs. A. A. Holliday and W. H. Holliday, the within named defendants, in person, a true copy of this writ.” This language is almost identical with that of the return held to be insufficient in the case of King v. Goodson, 42 Tex. 153, and, on that authority, the service must be held to be bad. In the statement of the sheriff’s costs, at the end of the transcript, fees for delivering two citations are charged, but we do not think this cures the defect in the return. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

[Opinion delivered January 29, 1886.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holliday v. Steele, 65 Tex. 388, 1886 Tex. LEXIS 674 (Tex. 1886).

65 Tex. 388 (Holliday v. Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scruggs v. Gribble
17 S.W.2d 153 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Lipscomb v. Wood County
292 S.W. 522 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Fitzpatrick v. Dorris Bros.
284 S.W. 303 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Lipscomb v. Wood County
282 S.W. 278 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Mosaic Templars of America v. Gaines
265 S.W. 721 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Finley v. State
230 S.W. 420 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1921)
Kellam v. Trail
185 S.W. 988 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
McMillon v. Harrison
63 So. 427 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1913)
Scott v. Ray
141 S.W. 1002 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Duke v. Spiller
111 S.W. 787 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Jackson v. Tenney
1906 OK 102 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1906)
Rutherford v. Davenport
16 S.W. 110 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1891)
Chowning v. Sumner
3 Willson 447 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1888)