Holliday v. State

288 S.W. 1077, 105 Tex. Crim. 456, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 585
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 17, 1926·No. No. 10404.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction in the County Court at Law of Jefferson County for unlawfully carrying a pistol, punishment a fine of $100.

There is no question of the fact that appellant was carrying a pistol. He was found with it in his possession. He told the officers at the time he was carrying it for protection. On the trial of the case he testified that he had left the pistol at the home of a relative in Beaumont while on his way from Port Arthur, his home, to Lake Charles, Louisiana, ánd that on the occasion of his arrest he had gone from Port Arthur to get the pistol and take it back home. We presume that the law of this issue was submitted to the jury in a manner acceptable to the appellant, as there is no complaint of any error in the charge. The reconciliation of conflicts in testimony is for the *457 jury who are made by statute the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of their testimony. They have solved the question as to whether appellant was in fact carrying the pistol lawfully, against him.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holliday v. State, 288 S.W. 1077, 105 Tex. Crim. 456, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 585 (Tex. 1926).

288 S.W. 1077 (Holliday v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyde v. State
68 S.W.2d 200 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)