Holliday v. State
391 S.W.3d 925, 2013 WL 703839, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 217
Opinion
[926] ORDER
Appellant John J. Holliday appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holliday v. State, 391 S.W.3d 925, 2013 WL 703839, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 217 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
391 S.W.3d 925 (Holliday v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.