Holliday v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Holliday v. State

35 So. 2d 4, 160 Fla. 374, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 749

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 30, 1948·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

On appeal here it is contended that the evidence adduced on the part of the State is legally insufficient to support a verdict and judgment of manslaughter. We have examined the transcript of the record and briefs and have concluded that the appellant has not carried the burden of proof establishing reversible error, as required by law, and accordingly the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, SEBRING and ADAMS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., and BARNS, J. dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

On appeal here it is contended that the evidence adduced on the part of the State is legally insufficient to support a verdict and judgment of manslaughter. We have examined the transcript of the record and briefs and have concluded that the appellant has not carried the burden of proof establishing reversible error, as required by law, and accordingly the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN, SEBRING and ADAMS, JJ., concur. THOMAS, C. J., and BARNS, J. dissent.

Holliday v. State, 35 So. 2d 4, 160 Fla. 374, 1948 Fla. LEXIS 749 (Fla. 1948).

Pincite

35 So. 2d 4 (Holliday v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.