Holliday v. R. M. McPherson & Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Holliday v. R. M. McPherson & Co.

36 Ga. 659

DecidedDecember 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Ga. 659 (Holliday v. R. M. McPherson & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holliday v. R. M. McPherson & Co., 36 Ga. 659 (Ga. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Walker, J.

1. There is no such abuse of the discretion of the chancellor in this case as to require the interposition of this Court. We have said again'and agaiii, that this Court will not control the discretion of the Court below, except in ease of the abuse of his discretion. Where the rights of the parties may be finally settled by a trial, and no harm be done in the meantime, we are loth to control the Court in such interlocutory orders as may be deemed necessary pending the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker, J.

1. There is no such abuse of the discretion of the chancellor in this case as to require the interposition of this Court. We have said again'and agaiii, that this Court will not control the discretion of the Court below, except in ease of the abuse of his discretion. Where the rights of the parties may be finally settled by a trial, and no harm be done in the meantime, we are loth to control the Court in such interlocutory orders as may be deemed necessary pending the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Ga. 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holliday-v-r-m-mcpherson-co-ga-1867.