Holliday v. Lovin

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holliday v. Lovin

890 S.W.2d 379, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1998, 1994 WL 714556

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 27, 1994·No. No. 65626·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheri Holliday, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis granting respondent’s, Gerald Lovin, Jr.’s, motion to modify, awarding child support and attorneys fees. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Cheri Holliday, appeals from an order entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis granting respondent’s, Gerald Lovin, Jr.’s, motion to modify, awarding child support and attorneys fees. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence, and no error of law appears. As we further find an extended opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the circuit court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum solely for the use the parties here involved has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Holliday v. Lovin, 890 S.W.2d 379, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1998, 1994 WL 714556 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

890 S.W.2d 379 (Holliday v. Lovin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.