Holliday v. Frasure

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holliday v. Frasure

231 A.D. 785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D. 785 (Holliday v. Frasure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holliday v. Frasure, 231 A.D. 785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order setting aside verdict as against defendant Callahan and granting a new trial as to him is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was warranted by the evidence. Judgment against defendants Frasure, and order denying motion for new trial as to them, are affirmed, with costs. Order denying motion of defendant Callahan for a nonsuit and dismissal of the complaint as to him is affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order setting aside verdict as against defendant Callahan and granting a new trial as to him is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and verdict reinstated, on the ground that the verdict of the jury was warranted by the evidence. Judgment against defendants Frasure, and order denying motion for new trial as to them, are affirmed, with costs. Order denying motion of defendant Callahan for a nonsuit and dismissal of the complaint as to him is affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D. 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holliday-v-frasure-nyappdiv-1930.