Holliday v. Coleman

2 Va. 162
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided March 25, 1811·Published

Opinion

Which last decree the court is of opinion is erroneous, and ought to be reversed; and I am directed to report the following as the opinion of this court:

“The court is of opinion that the decree is erroneous, so far as it relates to the slaves Little Jenny and Sylvia, and their increase; inasmuch as, by a decree made the 25th day of May, 1790, in a suit between the same parties, the deed of settlement made the 14th day of March, 1774, in which the said slaves Little Jenny and Sylvia are mentioned, was declared fraudulent, as to the appellant Lewis Holliday, and the bill of the appellees dismissed with costs; which this court considers a complete bar to any claim of the appellees under the said deed of settlement. And, as to the slaves claimed by the appellees under the will of Zachary Lewis, this court discovers no sufficient ground to rule the appellant Lewis Holliday to give bond and security for their forthcoming after the* death of Betty Holliday. ” (1)

Decree reversed, and bill dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holliday v. Coleman, 2 Va. 162 (Va. 1811).

2 Va. 162 (Holliday v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.