Holley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holley v. State

93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1050

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 3, 1917

Docket8875

StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 236 (Holley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holley v. State, 93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1050 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Geobge, J.

1. The accused was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury, on an accusation charging him with the offense of carrying a concealed weapon. There was direct evidence of his guilt, and the court did not err in adjudging him guilty, nor in subsequently overruling his motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds.

2. The special ground based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is without merit. No supporting affidavit was submitted to the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Geobge, J.

1. The accused was tried before the court without the intervention of a jury, on an accusation charging him with the offense of carrying a concealed weapon. There was direct evidence of his guilt, and the court did not err in adjudging him guilty, nor in subsequently overruling his motion for a new trial, based upon the general grounds.

2. The special ground based upon alleged newly discovered evidence is without merit. No supporting affidavit was submitted to the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 S.E. 236, 20 Ga. App. 723, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-state-gactapp-1917.