Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Holley v. State

Holley v. State

255 So. 3d 293
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 17418 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2018·No. CASE NO.: 2D18-3529·Published

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Petitioner's motion to expedite is denied as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holley v. State, 255 So. 3d 293 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

255 So. 3d 293 (Holley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)