Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Holley v. State

Holley v. State

255 So. 3d 293
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 9, 2018
DocketCASE NO.: 2D18-3529
StatusPublished

This text of 255 So. 3d 293 (Holley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holley v. State, 255 So. 3d 293 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is required to make an express and distinct demand for performance before mandamus will be considered. See Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So. 2d 293, 294 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

Petitioner's motion to expedite is denied as moot.

LaROSE, C.J., and MORRIS and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Al-Hakim v. State
783 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 So. 3d 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.