Holley v. Shirley

521 F. App'x 176
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 16, 2013·No. No. 12-8122·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant D. Shirley in Holley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no re[177] versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Shirley, No. l:ll-cv-00508-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We deny Holley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holley v. Shirley, 521 F. App'x 176 (4th Cir. 2013).

521 F. App'x 176 (Holley v. Shirley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SEELIG v. PERRY
M.D. North Carolina, 2020