Holley v. Shirley
This text of 521 F. App'x 176 (Holley v. Shirley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant D. Shirley in Holley’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no re[177]*177versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Shirley, No. l:ll-cv-00508-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 19 & entered Nov. 20, 2012). We deny Holley’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 F. App'x 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-shirley-ca4-2013.