Holley v. PAROLE BD.
723 N.W.2d 205, 477 Mich. 927, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2627
This text of 723 N.W.2d 205 (Holley v. PAROLE BD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holley v. PAROLE BD., 723 N.W.2d 205, 477 Mich. 927, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2627 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
Kerry B. HOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2005 *206 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
LaCROSS v. Zang
723 N.W.2d 205 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
723 N.W.2d 205, 477 Mich. 927, 2006 Mich. LEXIS 2627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-parole-bd-mich-2006.