Holley v. Georgia

Supreme Court

Holley v. Georgia

314 U.S. 576, 62 S. Ct. 73

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 13, 1941·No. No. 168·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 436-37; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396, 398-99; § 6-1607, Code of Georgia of 1933; Rule 40 (c) of the Supreme Court of Georgia. The motion for leave to proceed further in jorma pauperis is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 436-37; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396, 398-99; § 6-1607, Code of Georgia of 1933; Rule 40 (c) of the Supreme Court of Georgia. The motion for leave to proceed further in jorma pauperis is therefore denied.

Holley v. Georgia, 314 U.S. 576, 62 S. Ct. 73 (1941).

Pincite

314 U.S. 576 (Holley v. Georgia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related