Holley v. Georgia

Supreme Court

Holley v. Georgia

314 U.S. 576, 62 S. Ct. 73

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 13, 1941

DocketNo. 168

StatusPublished

This text of 314 U.S. 576 (Holley v. Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holley v. Georgia, 314 U.S. 576, 62 S. Ct. 73 (1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 436-37; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396, 398-99; § 6-1607, Code of Georgia of 1933; Rule 40 (c) of the Supreme Court of Georgia. The motion for leave to proceed further in jorma pauperis is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion to strike the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question. McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432, 436-37; Forbes v. State Council of Virginia, 216 U. S. 396, 398-99; § 6-1607, Code of Georgia of 1933; Rule 40 (c) of the Supreme Court of Georgia. The motion for leave to proceed further in jorma pauperis is therefore denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

314 U.S. 576, 62 S. Ct. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-georgia-scotus-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack