Holley v. Brickers
This text of 466 F. App'x 199 (Holley v. Brickers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tanyin B. Holley, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Brickers, No. 1:10-cv-1205GBL-TRJ, 2011 WL 4498992 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We deny Holley’s pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint.
AFFIRMED.
We note that we have considered the merits of Holley’s deliberate indifference claim, but find no reversible error in the district court's adjudication of it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
466 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-brickers-ca4-2012.