Holley v. Brickers

466 F. App'x 199
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7372
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 199 (Holley v. Brickers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holley v. Brickers, 466 F. App'x 199 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tanyin B. Holley, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holley v. Brickers, No. 1:10-cv-1205GBL-TRJ, 2011 WL 4498992 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2011). We deny Holley’s pending motion for leave to file an amended complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-v-brickers-ca4-2012.