Holley, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.
This text of Holley, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty. (Holley, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL HOLLEY, : No. 8 EM 2021 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2021, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Emergency Motion to Preserve Testimony,” treated as a
Petition for Writ of Mandamus, is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holley, M. v. Ct. Com. Pleas. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-m-v-ct-com-pleas-phila-cty-pa-2021.