Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 23, 2017·No. Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co. - No. 82 EM 2017·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

MICHAEL HOLLEY, : No. 82 EM 2017 :

Petitioner :

: :

v. :

: :

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, :

:

Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Motion for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation

is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of

record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co., (Pa. 2017).

Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co. (Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)