Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 23, 2017·No. Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co. - No. 82 EM 2017·Published
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL HOLLEY, : No. 82 EM 2017 :
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, :
:
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Motion for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co., (Pa. 2017).
Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co. (Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)