Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.
This text of Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co. (Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL HOLLEY, : No. 82 EM 2017 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Motion for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hybrid representation
is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of
record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holley, M. v. CCP Phila. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holley-m-v-ccp-phila-co-pa-2017.