Hollern v. State

810 So. 2d 1093, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3772, 2002 WL 440396
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-1823
StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1093 (Hollern v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollern v. State, 810 So. 2d 1093, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3772, 2002 WL 440396 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

HARRIS, J.

The State concedes that even in its corrected judgment of sentence, the court failed to list each count and its separate sentence. This was apparently a scrivener’s error and we remand for correction.

REMANDED for correction of sentence.

COBB and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1093, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3772, 2002 WL 440396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollern-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.