Holler v. Brickley

244 So. 2d 444
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 19, 1971
DocketNo. 70-430
StatusPublished

This text of 244 So. 2d 444 (Holler v. Brickley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holler v. Brickley, 244 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

PIERCE, Chief Judge.

Appellant having failed to show that the findings of the County Judge’s Court in this probate matter were clearly erroneous or that the legal effect of the evidence as a whole was misinterpreted by the trial court, the order denying her petition for establishment and probate of a lost or destroyed will is affirmed on authority of In re Evers’ Estate, 1948, 160 Fla. 225, 34 So. 2d 561; In re Wider’s Estate, Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 422; In re Zimmerman’s Estate, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 560, and In re Yost’s Estate, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 753.

LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of Zimmerman
84 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
In Re Yost's Estate
117 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Estate of Evers v. American Legion Hospital for Crippled Children
34 So. 2d 561 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Wider v. Wider
62 So. 2d 422 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 So. 2d 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holler-v-brickley-fladistctapp-1971.