Holler v. Brickley
244 So. 2d 444
Opinion
Appellant having failed to show that the findings of the County Judge’s Court in this probate matter were clearly erroneous or that the legal effect of the evidence as a whole was misinterpreted by the trial court, the order denying her petition for establishment and probate of a lost or destroyed will is affirmed on authority of In re Evers’ Estate, 1948, 160 Fla. 225, 34 So. 2d 561; In re Wider’s Estate, Fla. 1952, 62 So.2d 422; In re Zimmerman’s Estate, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 560, and In re Yost’s Estate, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 753.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holler v. Brickley, 244 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).
244 So. 2d 444 (Holler v. Brickley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Estate of Zimmerman
84 So. 2d 560 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
In Re Yost's Estate
117 So. 2d 753 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Estate of Evers v. American Legion Hospital for Crippled Children
34 So. 2d 561 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Wider v. Wider
62 So. 2d 422 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)