Hollenbaugh v. State ex rel. Town of Princeton

11 Ind. 556
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 16, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 Ind. 556 (Hollenbaugh v. State ex rel. Town of Princeton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hollenbaugh v. State ex rel. Town of Princeton, 11 Ind. 556 (Ind. 1859).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This prosecution was instituted under an ordinance declaring the sale of intoxicating liquors, beer, &c., to be a nuisance, forbidding such sale, and prescribing [557]*557punishment therefor. The defendant was fined the amount r fixed in the ordinance.

S. Judah, for the appellant.

The validity of the ordinance is questioned.

Following the case of Beebe v. The State, 6 Ind. R. 501, we think this question has been already settled.

The judgment is reversed. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

School Town of Andrews v. Heiney
98 N.E. 628 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1912)
Carr v. Town of Fowler
74 Ind. 590 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Ind. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollenbaugh-v-state-ex-rel-town-of-princeton-ind-1859.