Holleman v. Fowler
This text of 454 S.W.2d 100 (Holleman v. Fowler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appears to be a suit by the appellee to recover judgment upon a $30,-000 note and to impress a constructive trust upon certain land. The chancellor granted the money judgment but refused to enforce the asserted trust. The appellants gave notice of appeal and filed a two-volume record in this court, but they have not submitted an abstract or a brief. As to them the decree must be affirmed under our Rule 10.
The appellee filed notice of cross appeal and has submitted a brief urging that the chancellor erred in refusing to declare a constructive trust. The appellee, however, has not abstracted that part of the record pertinent to her cross appeal, as she should have done. Terry v. Klein, 133 Ark. 363, 201 S. W. 801 (1918). It being impossible for all the seven judges to examine the record, we have no choice except to affirm the decree on cross appeal as well. Insured Lloyds v. Ahrend, 245 Ark. 225, 431 S. W. 2d 740 (1968).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 S.W.2d 100, 248 Ark. 809, 1970 Ark. LEXIS 1298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holleman-v-fowler-ark-1970.