Hollander, William Ronald

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Hollander, William Ronald

DecidedFebruary 28, 2007

DocketPD-1567-06

StatusPublished

This text of Hollander, William Ronald (Hollander, William Ronald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hollander, William Ronald, (Tex. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. 1567-06 WILLIAM RONALD HOLLANDER, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.

ORDER

The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3 and 68.5, because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.

The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.

En banc

Filed: February 28, 2007

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI