Hollander, William Ronald
Opinion
FROM THE NINTH COURT OF APPEALS
MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.The petition for discretionary review violates Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.3 and 68.5, because the original petition is not accompanied by 11 copies and grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Filed: February 28, 2007
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hollander, William Ronald (Hollander, William Ronald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.