Hollander v. Hollander
232 A.D. 664
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 232 A.D. 664 (Hollander v. Hollander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hollander v. Hollander, 232 A.D. 664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Order affirmed. The defenses are sufficiently broad to permit the defendant to show that the plaintiff has refused to resume marital relations with the defendant since the repudiation of the separation agreement. (Mirizio v. Mirizio, 242 N. Y. 74.) Present —• Dowling, P. J., Finch, MeAvoy, Martin and O’Malley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mirizio v. Mirizio
150 N.E. 605 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hollander-v-hollander-nyappdiv-1931.