Holland v. Votaw

131 S.W. 406, 103 Tex. 534, 1910 Tex. LEXIS 243
Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 1910·No. Application No. 6996.·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

We agree with the Court of Civil Appeals in the construction of the Act of 1907 (Laws 30th Leg., 308), that it does not undertake to make valid conveyances that before were invalid, even where the invalidity exists only for want of proper certificates of acknowledgment to deeds of married women. That statute, as did the one of which it is an amendment, relates only to the admissibility of deeds as evidence because of their having been recorded, and not to questions affecting their sufficiency as conveyances. Therefore, no question arises as to the power of the Legislature to validate the deeds of married women which are inoperative only because of defective certificates of acknowledgment, and we are not to be understood as passing on that question in refusing the application.

Writ of error refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holland v. Votaw, 131 S.W. 406, 103 Tex. 534, 1910 Tex. LEXIS 243 (Tex. 1910).

131 S.W. 406 (Holland v. Votaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hinojosa v. Edgerton
447 S.W.2d 670 (Texas Supreme Court, 1969)
Acklin v. First National Bank
254 N.W. 769 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1934)
Andrus v. Hutchinson
17 F.2d 472 (Fifth Circuit, 1927)
Clements v. Texas Co.
273 S.W. 993 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Blomstrom v. Wells
239 S.W. 227 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Delay v. Truitt
182 S.W. 732 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Pilkington v. Potwin
144 N.W. 39 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)