Holland v. Total Construction, Inc.
This text of Holland v. Total Construction, Inc. (Holland v. Total Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
ROBERT HOLLAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N10C-10-175 CLS v. ) ) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION, ) INC., LANDREW ) FLOORING, INC., and ) ARMAND CAPALDI, T/A, ) FUSION FLOORS, INC. ) and/or FUSION FLOORING, ) INC., ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER
On this 14th Day of August and upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to
Amend the Complaint, it appears to the Court that:
On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff Robert Holand (“Plaintiff”) moved to
amend his Complaint in order to correct the spelling of his name and to
assert claims of direct negligence. On July 29, 2014, Plaintiff’s counsel
informed the Court that, due to a settlement reached with defendants Total
Construction, Inc. and Landrew Flooring, Inc., Plaintiff only seeks to correct
his name because the other issue is now rendered moot. 1 Based on this
letter, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED so that he may correct his name.
IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/Calvin L. Scott Judge Calvin L. Scott, Jr.
1 Trans. ID. 55800996.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holland v. Total Construction, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-total-construction-inc-delsuperct-2014.