Holland v. Supreme Council

25 A. 367, 54 N.J.L. 490, 25 Vroom 490, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 25 A. 367 (Holland v. Supreme Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Supreme Council, 25 A. 367, 54 N.J.L. 490, 25 Vroom 490, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50 (N.J. 1892).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

This suit was brought by Mary Holland on a-Relief Fund certificate made by the Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends- to James Holland, now deceased. So far as is material to this case the certificate is in these words-: This Certifies, That James Holland of Jersey City, a member of the Council named below, having duly applied therefor is entitled to a benefit of not exceeding two thousand dollars from the Relief Fund of the Order of Chosen Friends, which sum shall in case of death be paid to his wife Mary Holland in the manner and subject to the conditions set forth-in the laws governing said Relief Fund and in the application-for such benefit.” Sealed with the seal of the Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends.

The Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends is a corporation organized under the laws of Indiana. The objects of the organization as expressed in its constitution are : First. To unite in bonds of fraternity, aid and protection all acceptable white persons of good character, steady habits, sound bodily health, reputable calling, and who believe in a supreme-intelligent being, the creator and preserver of the universe^ Second. To improve the condition of its membership, morally, socially and materially, by timely counsel in the seven cardinal! virtues, and instructive lessons in the seven liberal arts and [492]*492■sciences, by- encouragement in business, and by assistance to ■obtain employment when in need. Third. To establish a ■relief fund from which members of this organization who have •complied with all its rules and regulations may receive the benefit in a sum not' exceeding three thousand dollars ($3,000), which shall be paid as hereafter provided, upon either of the following conditions, viz.: a. When a member becomes disabled by the infirmities of old age; provided, he or she has reached the age of seventy-five years, b. When, by reason of ■disease or accident, a member becomes totally and permanently •disabled from following any occupation, c. When a member has died. Fourth. To establish a fund for the relief of sick .and distressed members. Fifth. To establish an indemnity fund for the purpose of protecting the relief fund from fraudulent or improper claims by enabling proper investigation to be made in regard to persons admitted as members, and the alleged facts upon which the claim itself is based.

To effectuate the objects of the association, members are ■divided into two classes — (1) social members and (2) beneficiary members. Social members are those who pay a certain •certificate fee and regular dues. These members are entitled to all the honors, rights and' privileges of any other members, •except that they are not entitled to the benefits of the relief fund, and they are also exempt from contributing to that fund. This fund is in the exclusive control of the. Supreme Council. .■Subordinate councils established by the Supreme Council, to which the social members belong, are, by section 2, article 10 •of the constitution of the order, excluded from all control over the relief fund.

Beneficiary membership is obtained by persons who are or become social members upon an application for such membership, to be made upon a form of petition furnished by the •Supreme Council. This application must be approved by the supreme medical examiner, and upon approval by the supreme medical examiner, based upon his examination of the appli■cant, and of the answers made by him to certain questions propounded, a certificate of membership is issued. The certifi[493]*493cate, when issued, entitles the member to $1,000 or $2,000 or $3,000, as the applicant may elect. For such certificate the-member is required to pay one assessment for the relief fund, to be applied to the first assessment to be levied after its date,, and the same amount on each assessment thereafter made by the authority of the Supreme Council according to the following table:

At the ages of On $1,000. On $2,000. On $3,000..

18 and 25 inclusive, $O 35 $0 $0 05

26 30 0 40 0 80 20

31 35 0 45 0 90 35

36 40 0 50 1 00 50

41 45 0 60 1 20 80'

46 50 0 75 1 50 25

51 54 1 00 2 00 00

By the Belief Fund laws any member of the association is entitled to make application for a beneficiary membership,, except that manufacturers of gunpowder and other explosives, retail liquor dealers and bartenders are entirely excluded from, beneficial membership.

Whatever may be the status of an association of this character in its social, charitable, and purely benevolent features, the-relation between the association and such of its members as-have become “ beneficiary members under its “ relief fund scheme is essentially a contractual relation. The right of a member to participate in that fund is a right arising from contract, and the disbursements from that fund are not voluntary gifts donated from a charitable or benevolent motive, but payments in fulfillment of contract obligations. - The contract of’ the association with its beneficiary members is made up of the-application for such membership, the certificate issued, which is an acceptance of the application, and the charter, constitution and by-laws of the society, and in its construction and-effect does not differ essentially from an ordinary policy of insurance. Bac. Ben. Soc., §§ 51, 52; Niblack Mut. Ben. Soc.,. §§ 163,164, 165, 166,166a; Commonwealth v. Wetherbee, 105 Mass. 149.

[494]*494The deceased made his application for a Relief Fund certificate in December, 1889. The application was made upon a printed form furnished by the Supreme Council, annexed to which was, in approved form, the “ Applicant’s Statement to *the Medical Examiner.” This statement ■ contained certain ■questions and the applicant’s answers thereto, and at the foot of the statement the following sentence occurs: The foregoing are warranted to be full and true answers to the questions proposed.” Both the application and the “ Statement to the Medical Examiner ” were signed by the deceased. On these papers and a personal examination by the medical examiner the certificate was issued. The application was dated December 3d, 1889; the certificate was issued December 9th, 1889; the deceased died January 5th, 1890. At the time of his death he was a member of the association and not under .suspension.

The defence at the trial was that the certificate of beneficial ■membership was obtained fraudulently by means of false and fraudulent representations. In his application the deceased represented that his occupation was that of a printer, and that his business was pressman ; that he was employed by P. Lorillard, in Jersey City, and had been so employed for nine years. In his statement to the medical examiner he answered in the negative the question : Are you engaged in the sale or manufacture of wine, beer, or distilled liquors ? ” The proof at the trial was that the deceased was employed in the printing ■department of the works of P. Lorillard for a period of time down to December, 1881; that in July, 1883, he was employed in another department of the same works, and left that employment in June, 1884, and that he had not been in Lorillard’s employ after that date.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Payne v. Empire Life Ins. Co.
351 So. 2d 538 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1977)
Loy v. Loy.
222 S.W.2d 873 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1949)
Ex Parte Guinn
41 S.W.2d 219 (Texas Supreme Court, 1931)
Security Benefit Ass'n v. Henning
74 Colo. 394 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1924)
Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. Wernette
216 S.W. 669 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Hayes
76 So. 12 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
Drews v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
79 N.J.L. 398 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1910)
Supreme Conclave Improved Order of Heptasophs v. Dailey
47 A. 277 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1900)
Locomotive Engineers' Mutual Life & Accident Insurance v. Winterstein
44 A. 199 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1899)
Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order of United Workmen v. Connolly
43 A. 286 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1899)
Roxbury Lodge, No. 184 v. Hocking
38 A. 693 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1897)
Supreme Council of Golden Star Fraternity v. Conklin
38 A. 659 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1897)
Golden Star Fraternity v. Martin
35 A. 908 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1896)
Supreme Assembly, Royal Society of Good Fellows v. McDonald
35 A. 1061 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1896)
Levell v. Royal Arcanum
30 N.Y.S. 205 (Superior Court of New York, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 A. 367, 54 N.J.L. 490, 25 Vroom 490, 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-supreme-council-nj-1892.