Holland v. Stewart

2 Mich. N.P. 39
CourtCircuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Mich. N.P. 39 (Holland v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 10th Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holland v. Stewart, 2 Mich. N.P. 39 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1870).

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

The defendant purchased lime of the plaintiffs, assuming to be the agent of one Tlios. K. Mosher. The plaintiffs on his representation charged the lime to Mosher, but on his denying the agency of the defendant, plaintiffs communicated the lact to defendant, and he promised to pay for the lime. Defendant was not authorized to purchase the lime on the credit of Mosher.

The defendant is himself liable. Not having authority to bind the person in whose name he assumed to act, he is liable himself as principal. 19 John, 63, 558; 33 Id., 58, 307; 1 Cow., 536; 7 Cow., 454.

Judgment for plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mott v. Hicks
1 Cow. 513 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Stone v. Wood
7 Cow. 453 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mich. N.P. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-stewart-micirct10-1870.