Holland v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Holland v. State

489 S.W.2d 594

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 24, 1973

Docket46187

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 489 S.W.2d 594 (Holland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holland v. State, 489 S.W.2d 594 (Tex. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for insult to the flag of the United States under Article 152, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; punishment was assessed by the court at two years, probated. (See also companion cases, Van Slyke v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 590, and Case v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 593, this day decided.)

In this cause appellant stipulated to the evidence in Van Slyke v. State, supra, and Case v. State, supra, and the same will not be repeated herein.

All six grounds of error challenge the constitutionality of Article 152, V.A.P.C. Such has been decided adversely to appellant in Van Slyke v. State, supra; Case v. State, supra; Delorme v. State, 488 S.W.2d 808; Deeds v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 718, to which reference is made and holdings adhered to herein.

There being no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

ODOM, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for insult to the flag of the United States under Article 152, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; punishment was assessed by the court at two years, probated. (See also companion cases, Van Slyke v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 590, and Case v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 489 S.W.2d 593, this day decided.)

In this cause appellant stipulated to the evidence in Van Slyke v. State, supra, and Case v. State, supra, and the same will not be repeated herein.

All six grounds of error challenge the constitutionality of Article 152, V.A.P.C. Such has been decided adversely to appellant in Van Slyke v. State, supra; Case v. State, supra; Delorme v. State, 488 S.W.2d 808; Deeds v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 474 S.W.2d 718, to which reference is made and holdings adhered to herein.

There being no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

489 S.W.2d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holland-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack